Not writing much at this blog, but I am still thinking a great deal about how to teach. Expect more forthcoming during the summer. For now, contemplate with me this person’s take on the STEM initiative.
It takes time for changes to become apparent. Especially in a huge complex thing such as the modern education industriplex. I see this all the time in regard to the transition from secondary to higher education. The college entrance game is a constantly changing dance. Colleges change their criteria and that means high school college counselors then change accordingly, and then slowly, maybe as much as a generation later, students and their nervous parents change as well. Much of this generational shift is because many parents work off their own college experience to guide their children. That is not wise. There is nothing about my experience in the early 80’s that is of use to my current college age children. We must approach this issue like any other, with careful scrutiny and real knowledge, not fear and propaganda. Let me illustrate.
Right now many parents believe the single most important thing for a college bound junior or senior in high school is their ACT and SAT scores, right? Of course right. No, actually, it is quickly becoming quite wrong. Read this article from the inside and see what I mean. But the majority opinion will prevail and guide most entrance activity even after the colleges have left this form of criteria behind. Why? Because most parents and college counselors are working off past information, not current. While the principal of a large private high school I invited college admissions directors from two large schools near our high school to come speak. One was from a prestigious State school that everyone wanted to get into. The other was from a very sought after private college nearby. Both said the same thing: what is true this year will change next year. And one of the schools, now seven years ago, no longer required ACT/SAT scores for admission.
What amazed me most about those evenings were the large number of parents who afterward over cookies and coffee said something like, “Well, I listened, but I don’t believe them. We are still going to put our eggs in those baskets.” One of those parents dropped almost $40K that year to ensure that their child (in addition to the tuition for a private high school diploma) was given coaching and tutoring on all aspects of getting into an Ivy League school. Their fear over their child’s success being tied to what college they got into made them deaf to the very folks trying to tell them that the rules were in constant flux. They just couldn’t hear it.
All this to say two things: a) as long as we continue with this unsustainable thing we currently call higher education, admissions will be a roll of the dice, not a guaranteed anything, and b) fear will continue to be the main controlling factor for parent’s choices in guiding their child toward higher education. We need the college bubble to be popped, loudly.
Not so much a “book report” here as it is quotations that struck me as I worked through Kirk’s chapter, “Cultivating Educational Wastelands” from his work, The Politics of Prudence.
All the normal obvious things have to be said: Kirk was writing as I was coming into education. Things have not gotten better. But Kirk was speaking of those things prudent, not just holding up unreal ideals. To have something like his vision in front of us as we try to pursue what is best in education is helpful. I offer these quotes in hopes that you will read his entire essay; it is quite worth it.
“The United States is now the great power in the world. Nevertheless, who can praise an educational system that turns out young people marvelously ignorant — except for a very small minority — of history, geography, and foreign languages, and so unfitted to have anything to do with concerns larger that those of their own neighborhood. Worse still, what future have a people whose schooling has enabled them, at best, to ascertain the price of everything — but the value of nothing?” p. 240
“The primary end of the higher learning, in all lands and all times, has been what John Henry Newman called the training of the intellect to form a philosophical habit of mind.” (p. 241)
“The genuine higher education is not meant, really, to ‘create jobs’ or to train technicians. Incidentally, the higher education does tend to have such results, too; but only as by-products. We stand in danger of forgetting, during our pursuit of the incidentals, the fundamental aims of learning.
“Why were colleges and universities established, and what remains their most valuable function? To discipline the mind; to give men and women long views and to instill in them the virtue of prudence; to present a coherent body of ordered knowledge, in several great fields; to pursue that knowledge for its own sake; to help the rising generation to make its way toward wisdom and virtue.” (p. 243)
“The education of yesteryear was founded upon certain postulates. One of these was that much truth is ascertainable; another, that religious truth is the source of all good; a third, that we may profit by the wisdom of our ancestors; a fourth, that the individual is foolish, but the species is wise; a fifth, that wisdom is sought for its own sake; a sixth, that for the sake of the commonwealth, schooling should quicken the moral imagination.
“These postulates have not ceased to be true; it is only that they have been forgotten in our century’s obsession with power and money, and our century’s illusion that ideology is a ready and satisfactory substitute for thought.” (p. 251)
“Renewal failing, by the conclusion of the twentieth century America may have achieved complete equality in education: everybody compulsorily schooled, and everybody equally ignorant.” (p. 252)
In continuing to write on this blog, it is my hope and prayer that we together are pursuing something more than ‘power and money,’ but rather wisdom and virtue, the Great Good.
I think most of this article is right on spot. Worth your time reading.
Perhaps we are seeing a recovery of what it takes to rightly govern, even in our attempts at education. I have long held that all decisions regarding our children’s education should be made as close to the classroom as possible. The corporate structure of American education, whether Public, Charter, or Private, has been to move decisions farther out, rather closer to the classroom. Until now. I saw the following chart and had hope. Unions are just one way that collectivism has hurt good education, and allegiance to such is waning. May it continue.
Color me impressed with this great article from Bloomberg View of all places:
The folks over at EAG are keeping me thinking these days, but as I don’t have time to write for free while I try to meet bills by getting paid to write, I will just pass this nugget along to you from them. They reference in the post where you read the actual study, but they break it down pretty well.
I have been saying all along, it is not how much money you have to educate with, but what you spend it on…